I have very mixed feelings about the government regulating what people should just have the sense to do themselves. I had a similar reaction to the lawsuits filed against McDonald's and other restaurants, accusing them of causing people to be obese. I don't like McDonald's: the food is disgusting and unhealthy, their restaurants produce tons of waste, and their business practices are questionable. But no one is holding a gun to anyone's head and making them eat Big Macs. It's not like McDonald's hasn't tried to introduce healthier options. (Remember the McLean, anyone?) People want this stuff.
But I see the other side of the coin: it's very difficult to resist the marketing efforts of these large companies, especially when their turn their marketing "gun" on children. Yale University's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity recently completed a major study of fast food nutrition and marketing. Some conclusions:
- Only 12 of 3,039 possible kids’ meal combinations at 12 leading fast food restaurant met nutritional criteria for preschoolers.
- The industry spent $4.2 billion (yes, that's billion with a "b") advertising and marketing in 2009.
- This advertising works:
- 40% of children ages 2-11 ask their parents to go to McDonald’s at least once a week.
- 15% of preschoolers ask to go every day.
- 84% of parents report taking their child ages 2-11 to a fast food restaurant at least once in the past week.
- The average preschooler sees almost three ads per day for fast food; children ages 6-11 see three-and-a-half ads.
As with any issue like this, the causes are undoubtedly complex: increased time spent in front of the TV, more video games and web surfing, parents' fear of crime (e.g. being kidnapped by strangers) that leads them to keep their children inside, a suburban lifestyle that makes walking difficult (because of great distances, lack of good walking routes, etc.). But it's less than a coincidence that the rise in childhood obesity has occurred at the same time as the increase in the availability (not to mention the calorie count) in Happy Meals and their ilk.
So I reluctantly have to support this. As long as the "market" compels companies to push unhealthy products, and as long as people aren't willing or able to make smart decisions about this, I believe government needs to step in. I wish I had more confidence in the government to do this kind of thing right all the time. They don't, not because government is bad and evil, but because it's beholden to the same corporate interests that push growth and profit above any other criteria.
And perhaps it could actually help the fast-food companies themselves. If it levels the playing field by preventing any one company from gaining an advantage by offering more calories, sugar, flavor, etc., than the others, then they'd have to compete on other criteria, perhaps by offering healthy food with the best taste and/or lowest price.